Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Miller Time

Perhaps you like local sports journalist, Ron Cook, perhaps you don't.  Me, I'm somewhat indifferent.  Sometimes he gets it right, sometimes he's the master of the obvious, and sometimes he's the ultimate contrarian, dedicated to disagreeing with every colleague or fan that he encounters. 

Nonetheless, this post isn't about Cook, it's about the subject of his most recent article, tight end extraordinaire, Heath Miller.  In what has been a season reading like a dramatic saga regarding the individual athlete, whether it be injury, resistance to change, or contractual issues, one man has stood above the pack as standard bearer and teammate.  Yes, his name is Heath, or Heeeeeeeeeeeath, as you hear echoing from practically every stadium he performs in. The appreciation for Miller's excellence is so profound, Steeler Nation is often caught Heeeeathing even when Miller's backup David Paulson makes a snare.  Dr. Evil be damned, understudy Paulson is assuredly Mini-Miller.  Who better to imitate?

Miller's contributions this season must not be understated.  Gathering in 56 receptions through 12 games is no small feat considering the amount of time Miller is asked to play the role of third tackle/nanny to youthful linemen.  Look at the performances of rookie tackles Mike Adams and Kelvin Beachum, as both were thrust into duty, and you will understand just why Miller is regarded as the most complete football player on the team.  Unselfish? This guy makes Gandhi look like the rich guy who tosses a gum wrapper into the Salvation Army bucket.

Despite Miller's ability to disrupt a blitz or knock any opposing linebacker on his fanny, his involvement in the vertical game is where the big money lies. What Charlie Batch learned on Sunday is that Miller can simply own the middle of the field.  What John Harbaugh learned is that to beat the Steelers, you should consider defending #83, at least a little.  Take nothing away from Miller's big time performance on Sunday, but seriously, shame on the Ravens for just letting him ramble freely between the hashes, like a crazed wildebeest cruising up the Serengeti. 

Miller was not to be denied that victory, displaying yet another attribute of a great teammate, ...refusing to let his or her team fail.

Let's just hope that we can keep Heeeeathing for several more weeks, and a few more years to come.

All together now:  HEEEEEEEATH!

5 comments:

a-dawg said...

Off topic - but I found it very interesting:

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has landed on the cover of TIME magazine. The accompanying article contains plenty of interesting nuggets.

Here’s the first one that caught our eye.

Sean Gregory of TIME writes that one of the options being considered for replacing kickoffs entails giving the ball to the team that would have been kicking off at its own 30, automatically facing a fourth down and 15 yards to go. The team can then choose to punt or go for it, via fake punt or otherwise.

In other words, the kickoff would be replaced with the punt, and the onside kick would be replaced with a fourth-down conversion roughly half the distance of Ray Rice’s recent catch-and-run.

The idea would be to remove completely the high-speed, open-field collisions between large men who dip their heads instinctively at impact and place extra pressure on the C3-C4 area of the spine. While other injuries would be possible during the punt play that replaces the kickoff, the risk of catastrophic injury would be reduced.

NOW YOU JUST NEED A KICKER THAT CAN BANG 87 YARD FGs.

Briwatt said...

http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s16e08-sarcastaball

Here's a link the Southpark episode "Sarcastaball" that lampoons this and other Goodell game tinkerings. If Goodell has another five years, the game will barely resemble the game we grew up on. I'm ok with placing a higher emphasis on player safety, but I wonder how many rules are implemented to induce higher scoring. As much as I watch football, I can't say that I witness a disporportionate number of injuries following kickoffs then following plays from scrimmage.

a-dawg said...

I don't think it is the number of injuries during kickoffs....its that a disproportionate number of spinal cord injuries happpen on kickoffs.

I hate to agree with Ed Reed - but he summed it up best. If the NFL was truly interested in players' safety....there would be no Thursday night games. They quick turn-around is rough on the NFL players' body. And you have to realize something is up with Thursday night games when the home team wins all the time. And a lot of times versus a better opponent. PGH feel into that trap when they went to Tenn. Play that game on a Sunday - and its another story.

a-dawg said...

WOW - need to proof read better - several typos....sorry!

Briwatt said...

No worries. PittsburghFan is not up for any literary excellence awards this year.

The idea is intriguing. There aren't any current coaches ballsy enough to go to a "make it/take it" approach across the boards, but it would make comebacks more reasonable. You gotta fgure that a 4th and 15 is probably a 15-18% play, whereas the expected onside kick is what, a 6%-8%. It's a neat idea.